
As a senior advisor who has navigated C-suite executives and boards through hundreds of M&A transactions, I will be direct: the most common M&A post-mortem I attend is for a deal that was strategically dead on arrival.
You are likely familiar with the terrifying statistic that 70% to 90% of all M&A deals fail to deliver their anticipated value. As an executive, you assume this is a failure of negotiation, a failure to secure the right price, or a failure of legal drafting.
You are mistaken.
Most M&A failures are not failures of negotiation; they are failures of strategy. They fail at the whiteboard, months or years before a banker is ever engaged. They fail because the leadership team went "shopping" for an "opportunity" without a map. The research is clear: the primary causes of failure are "unclear objectives, strategy and metrics", a "lack of discipline", and "unrealistically optimistic" revenue projections that lead the acquirer to, quite simply, pay too much.
This is not "shopping." This is the high-stakes execution of a corporate plan. If you and your board cannot articulate the precise strategic question that M&A answers, you have no business making an offer.
An M&A transaction cannot be your strategy. It must be a tool—a deliberate, and often high-risk, tool—to solve a specific business problem or execute a pre-existing corporate plan. It is a path to "leapfrog competitors... and scale faster than through organic growth alone".
Before you assemble any team, your internal steering committee must unanimously agree on which strategic "why" you are pursuing.
This is the most common rationale. You have hit a strategic plateau. Organic growth is too slow, and you need to acquire new geographic markets, new product or service offerings, or critical new technologies and intellectual property. You are buying a business to bolt it onto your own and accelerate your trajectory.
This is about fundamentally changing the balance of power in your market. You are acquiring a direct competitor to increase market share, remove a rival, and achieve significant economies of scale. This is the highest-risk, highest-reward category, and as we will see in Part 2, it carries immense regulatory baggage.
This is a reactive, but often necessary, move. This includes acquiring a disruptive competitor before they become an existential threat to your business model. It can also mean shoring up a critical link in your supply chain to protect your operations from volatility—a vertical integration play we will explore in detail.
This is a special, and frequently misunderstood, category. In an "acqui-hire," you are acquiring a company predominantly for its engineering or product team, not for its product, which is often discontinued shortly after the acquisition.
This strategy is common when talent is scarce and a cohesive, high-performing team is more valuable than the product they were building.
Be warned: the valuation for an acqui-hire is entirely different. It is not based on revenue or EBITDA. It is priced "per head" or "per engineer," with a "going rate" that can range from a few hundred thousand to two million dollars per team member. These are often "distressed sales" for the target company, representing a failure for their venture investors who may recoup less than their investment.
But for you, the buyer, it can be a massive strategic win for your R&D and human capital goals. The critical risk here is not overpayment; it is integration failure. The real purchase price is not the closing payment; it is the "retention packages" you must pay to the team to keep them. If that team walks out the door 90 days after closing, you have acquired absolutely nothing.
The "who" is just as important as the "why." "Absentee leaders who rely too heavily on outside advisors" and a "lack of commitment from senior management" are direct paths to failure. You, the executive, must personally lead this process.
Your team will be comprised of two parts:
This is your core leadership: you (the CEO), your CFO, your General Counsel, your COO, and the head of the business unit that will ultimately be responsible for integrating the new company. This team owns the "why." They are responsible for the final "Go / No-Go" decision and, most importantly, for the integration plan.
You must hire experts who specialize in M&A. This is not a place to use your general corporate counsel or your cousin who works in finance.
Investment Banker: This is your "quarterback". They will manage the process, identify and filter potential targets, run the valuation models, and act as the lead negotiator on price.
Legal Counsel (Your Law Firm): My role. We are not just "preparing documentation". We are the architects of the deal structure (see Part 3), the risk managers, and the leaders of the diligence "landmine sweep" (see Parts 6 & 7). We manage all legal aspects, from the first NDA to the final closing.
Accountants/Financial Advisors: Your accountants will conduct the deep financial diligence. This is not a simple audit; it is a forensic investigation into the target's "Quality of Earnings" (QoE)—a concept we will explore in detail in Part 5.
Integration Specialists: These are the most overlooked, yet most critical, members of the external team. Do not wait until after the deal closes to think about integration. Research shows that "starting integration earlier" and having the integration team involved from the outset to estimate synergies are key success factors.
The most dangerous mistake a CEO can make is to "outsource" the deal to their bankers and lawyers. The external team's job is to get the deal closed. Your internal team's job is to make the deal successful. These are two completely different things. Your external advisors provide expertise, but your internal steering committee must own the strategic rationale and the integration plan.
A deal without a clear "why" is just an expensive, high-risk distraction that will consume your management team for the next 18 months.
Your strategy is the map. It defines your "why." It tells you which targets to pursue, which to ignore, and, most importantly, it gives you the discipline to walk away from a "good deal" that doesn't fit your plan.
Now that you have your "why," the next critical decision is the "how." Continue to Part 2 where we'll explore the fundamental types of M&A deals—Horizontal, Vertical, and Conglomerate—and how that choice dictates your regulatory risk, your integration complexity, and your ultimate path to value.
Next in Series: Part 2: Horizontal, Vertical, or Conglomerate?
At the beginning
Read Next →
Keep Exploring

Ryan previously served as a PCI Professional Forensic Investigator (PFI) of record for 3 of the top 10 largest data breaches in history. With over two decades of experience in cybersecurity, digital forensics, and executive leadership, he has served Fortune 500 companies and government agencies worldwide.

The deal is closed—but this is the starting gun, not the finish line. Learn how to execute post-merger integration and avoid the talent exodus that destroys deals.

Reps & Warranties, Indemnification, and the 'hostage' escrow. Learn how to protect yourself from post-closing surprises when the seller lied.

The 100-page fortress that dictates every aspect of the transaction. Learn how to translate diligence findings into legal protections.