
If your firm relies solely on manual contract review in 2025, you're not just inefficient—you're exposed to malpractice liability.
Here's why: When AI tools can achieve 98%+ accuracy and catch issues exhausted associates miss, courts are beginning to ask: "Why didn't you use available technology?"
Traditional standard: What would a reasonably competent attorney do?
Emerging standard: What technology-assisted review methods are available to prevent errors?
Recent decisions suggest courts recognize AI tools as part of expected attorney competence:
Key principle: If technology exists that can prevent foreseeable errors, choosing not to use it may fall below the standard of care.
Analogies:
Reality: Exhausted attorneys miss critical clauses.
Statistics:
Malpractice exposure: When a missed clause costs the client millions, "we were working long hours" isn't a defense.
Best practice: AI-assisted review with attorney oversight provides:
Documentation: Complete analysis trail showing due diligence
Consistency: Same standard applied across all contracts
Comprehensiveness: Every clause analyzed, nothing skipped due to fatigue
Defensibility: If issue missed, you can demonstrate sophisticated tools were used and attorney judgment applied
AI adoption isn't optional—it's risk management. But how do you centralize contract intelligence across the firm?
Continue the Series:
#legalLiability #AIadoption #standardOfCare #legalRisk #innovation
#legalLiability #AIadoption #standardOfCare #legalRisk #innovation

Ryan previously served as a PCI Professional Forensic Investigator (PFI) of record for 3 of the top 10 largest data breaches in history. With over two decades of experience in cybersecurity, digital forensics, and executive leadership, he has served Fortune 500 companies and government agencies worldwide.

The complete ROI: how automating the 80% of drudgery frees your team for 100% high-value work.

How effective AI governance transforms from a defensive cost center into your single greatest competitive advantage.